Resolution Chemicals Ltd v H. Lundbeck A/S: SPCs and privity

No items found.
​
April 18, 2013
No items found.
Table of contents
  • Toc Heading
  • Toc Heading

Darren Smyth’s latest IPKat post concerns the recent decision on a preliminary point in Resolution Chemicals Ltd v H. Lundbeck A/S, and Lundbeck’s SPC for escitalopram.

The case was an action for revocation of Lundbeck’s SPC for invalidity of the underlying patent, and the judgement mainly concerned whether Resolution was estopped from bringing the action by privity of interest with the claimants in an earlier case relating to the same SPC.

Recent Case Reports

See all Case Reports

Transfer of costs application from Court of Appeal to Court of First Instance rejected
22 April 2026
The UPC Court of Appeal ruled that it lacks jurisdiction to assess costs applications and confirmed they must be filed at the Court of First Instance, rejecting a transfer request in Rematec v Europe Forestry.
​
Revocation of an independent claim does not automatically affect the validity of unchallenged independent claims
21 April 2026
In Emporia v Seoul Viosys, the UPC Central Division confirmed that the revocation of an independent claim does not automatically affect the validity of unchallenged claims. The decision underscores the importance of challenging all relevant claims where full patent revocation is sought.
​
Seriously deficient disclosure process not sufficient to reopen costs order - Cabo v MGA
08 April 2026
A High Court decision highlighting the consequences of inadequate disclosure searches under PD57AD and reaffirming that costs orders are final, even where later failures come to light.
​