Download now: LIFE SCIENCES WHITEPAPER - BUILDING AN INVESTABLE IP PORTFOLIO
​

Brexit and Intellectual Property – An Update

No items found.
​
October 30, 2019
Additional information
Chevron icon
Table of contents
Chevron icon
Table of contents
  • Toc Heading
  • Toc Heading

The European Union has announced that it will agree to the UK request for a further extension to the period in which the UK remains a full member of the EU (the “Article 50 period”) until 31 January 2020. This means that the UK will now definitely not leave the EU without a withdrawal agreement (so called “No Deal Brexit”) before that date. If a withdrawal agreement is ratified, then, although the UK may legally leave the EU earlier, in practice EU law will continue to apply to the UK until the end of a transition period that will last until at least December 2020. In particular, the UK would remain a full participant in the EU intellectual property systems (including EU Trade Marks and Community Designs) until the end of the transition period.

There remains considerable political uncertainty, and the UK is likely to see yet another General Election, and perhaps a further referendum on UK membership of the EU, so that the UK policy over Brexit is likely to vary over the coming months. However, the extension means that the legal situation in respect of EU intellectual property rights is clarified until at least early 2020. EIP continues to monitor the situation closely and will advise on the key developments.

EIP has maintained contingency plans to cover all the eventualities through this period of uncertainty, and we will continue to represent our clients in respect of EU-wide registered rights (EU Trade Marks and Community Registered Designs) as well as UK national rights. Meanwhile, the regime for obtaining patents in Europe is in any case unaffected by Brexit as the UK’s membership of the European Patent Organisation will continue unchanged. Therefore, EIP will continue to represent our clients in respect of both European and UK patents as currently.

If you have any questions about the issues raised in this update, please contact any member of the EIP Brexit Committee listed below, or your usual contact at EIP, by email or by calling +44 (0)20 7440 9510.

Darren Smyth

Claire Lehr

Paula Flutter

Andrew Sharples

Recent Case Reports

See all Case Reports

Bringing enforcement proceedings while an appeal is still pending risks liability for defendant’s costs
24 September 2026
The Court of Appeal held that setting aside a first-instance decision granting relief subject to recurring penalties generally has retroactive effect. Any penalty fees already paid will be refunded by the Court. The value of proceedings is determined by the interest of the party that brought the action. This is not changed as a result of an appeal. A claimant bringing enforcement proceedings while an appeal is still pending does so at its own risk and may be liable for the defendant’s costs related to the enforcement proceedings.‍
​
Replacement parts and the value of asserting a narrower claim combination
17 July 2026
The UPC's Düsseldorf Local Division found that Wessper's cartridges indirectly infringed Brita's patent, and that a narrower claim combination can turn a consumable into an essential element.
​
Preliminary objection on jurisdiction partially successful – UPC clarifies requirements of anchor-defendant jurisdiction for non-UPC territories
25 June 2026
The Hamburg Local Division let Nixu pursue US-based Infoblox in the UPC for Germany, France and Finland, but threw out the UK claim. To reach a non-UPC territory through an anchor defendant, a claimant must plead joint infringement there.
​