Case Reports
UPC Case Reports
No items found.
Other Case Reports
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Copyright infringement via hyperlinking?
04 May 2016
On 7 April 2016 Advocate General Wathelethas delivered his opinion in GS Media BV v Sanoma Media Netherlands BV, Playboy Enterprises International Inc., Britt Dekker (Case C‑160/15).
No items found.
Cadbury loses another battle over its purple trade mark
03 May 2016
In 2013, as part of the longstanding battle over Cadbury’s protection for the colour purple, the Court of Appeal (Société Des Produits Nestlé S.
No items found.
Trunki appeal dismissed by the Supreme Court
21 March 2016
The Supreme Court has upheld the Court of Appeal’s decision that the Kiddee Case produced by PMS did not infringe Magmatic’s Registered Community Design for the Trunki suitcase, “the CRD”.
No items found.
University’s dispute with inventor highlights importance of establishing ownership of IP
14 January 2016
A recent decision at the UK Intellectual Property Office emphasises again how important it is to establish ownership of rights in inventions (particularly before the first patent application is...
No items found.
Jaguar Land Rover fails in attempt to register trademark for shape of its cars
02 December 2015
Jaguar Land Rover’s application to register an EU-wide trademark for the shape of one of their Land Rover cars has been rejected by the EU General Court.
No items found.
Scammers posing as Intellectual Property Office fined £500,000
25 November 2015
Scammers who deceived intellectual property owners by issuing fraudulent renewal letters and invoices have been fined the maximum £500,000 penalty by the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court...
No items found.
HMRC opens consultation on proposed changes to Patent Box
22 October 2015
A consultation has been announced by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) seeking the views of patent holders and interested parties on proposed changes to the UK Patent Box scheme.
No items found.
EU Trade Mark Reform – Key Proposals and Implications
17 August 2015
After years of debate, the European Parliament, European Council and European Commission have reached an agreement in relation to a new European Union trade mark reform package, which will provide a...
No items found.
Alibaba case highlights importance of filing trademarks in China
26 June 2015
Alibaba is the largest e-commerce platform in China, and one of the biggest in the world. Its co-founder, Jack Ma, is the richest man in China; he is often compared to Bill Gates and Steve Jobs by...
No items found.
Remember: A UK patent application may not finally lapse for many years!
08 April 2015
In a recent decision of the UK Intellectual Property Office, an applicant for a UK patent was allowed to file a response to an examination report (“office action”) more than 18 months after the due...
No items found.
Reform of UK Provisions on Groundless Threats of Patent Infringement
11 March 2015
In August 2013, I produced a short commentary regarding the decision of Mr Recorder Meade QC in SDL Hair Ltd v Next Row Ltd & Ors [2013] EWPCC 31, where Mr Meade was faced with the question of...
No items found.
Abuse of Process – Patentee does not have to assert all known means of infringement
14 January 2015
A decision from Mr Justice Birss inAdaptive Spectrum And Signal Alignment Inc v British Telecommunications Plc[2014] EWHC 4194 has introduced additional complications for parties found to infringe a...
No items found.
Safeners can be active substances for purposes of supplementary protection certificates, says CJEU
07 August 2014
C‑11/13 Bayer CropScience AG v Deutsches Patent- und MarkenamtThe Court of Justice of the European Union rules that a supplementary protection certificate (SPC) can be granted in respect of a safener.
No items found.
Trademarks in sport
14 July 2014
A strong brand, and trademark protection, create business value. Indeed, intellectual property can become a company’s most valuable asset. Branding in sport is big business.
No items found.
Alice explained – US Supreme Court decision on computer-implemented inventions
01 July 2014
The question presented in Alice was whether claims directed to a computer-implemented scheme for mitigating “settlement risk” are patent eligible under 35 U. S. C. §101.
No items found.
Stay in the Know
The UPC Newsletter
Get expert insights and the top patent stories delivered straight to your inbox.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form. Please try again.