Case Reports
UPC Case Reports
No items found.
Other Case Reports
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Have your say on IPO fast track trademark opposition procedure
15 April 2013
The Intellectual Property Office (IPO) has launched a public consultation on their plans for a simplified and more cost-effective trademark opposition procedure to run alongside the existing system.
No items found.
RCDs – use of dotted lines in representations
12 April 2013
In his capacity as regular blogger for The IPKat, Partner Darren Smyth has posted on the use of dotted lines in representations of designs. This follows his participation in the conference this week...
No items found.
So when is a patent claim too broad?
27 March 2013
In Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Genentech Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 93 the Court of Appeal dismissed the claimants’ appeal, rejecting all their arguments in respect of construction, infringement,...
No items found.
Alcon puts the brakes on patent protection for AP Racing due to added matter
25 March 2013
AP Racing Limited v Alcon Components Limited [2013] EWPCC 3Two rival suppliers of brake calipers used in racing cars in the motorsport industry recently went head to head in the Patents County Courts.
No items found.
Added matter and omnibus claims: a UK perspective
12 March 2013
Environmental Recycling Technologies Plc v Upcycle Holdings Ltd [2013] EWPCC 4 – 5 February 2013.SummaryThis decision of the UK Patents County Court provides insight into the differences between UK...
No items found.
HHJ Birss sees through Bristan’s excuses
28 February 2013
This case ([2013] EWPCC 2), heard in the Patents County Court, concerns designs for electric shower units. Mira (the claimant) alleged that the Glee, Joy and Smile products, supplied by the defendant...
No items found.
Preventing use of disclosure outside litigation - appropriate undertakings for the confidentiality club
22 February 2013
Over the past few months two actions concerning the validity and infringement of IPCom’s European Patent EP 1,841,268 (IPCom v Nokia (Claim No: HC 10 C01233) and HTC v IPCom (Claim HC 11 C02064))...
No items found.
Losing the Right to Use Your Own Name – The Cipriani Saga
20 February 2013
In October 2008 a factually complex trade mark infringement and passing off case, involving the interpretation of agreements under Italian Law, came before Mr Justice Arnold (Hotel Cipriani SRL & Ors...
No items found.
CJEU decides on “business as usual” after ONE-L of a fight
25 January 2013
Leno Merken BV v Hagelkruis Beheer BV (ONEL / OMEL)A test case cooked up by Benelux attorneys called into question one of the central tenets of the CTM system - that use of a CTM in just one member...
No items found.
Darren Smyth makes inaugural post as IPKat blogger
23 January 2013
Partner Darren Smyth has made his first blog post for The IPKat following the announcement that he had become a full member of The IPKat team.
No items found.
Obvious to try in all but name?
18 December 2012
The applicability of the obvious to try question has been a thorny issue in UK patent law for some time, and the desire for a party seeking invalidity to apply this test has pervaded many recent...
No items found.
ZYNGA hit triple word score as Mattel’s Scrabble tile claim fails
30 November 2012
(1) J.W. Spear & Sons Ltd (2) Mattel, Inc. & (3) Mattel UK Limited -and- ZYNGA, Inc. [2012] EWHC 3345 (Ch) – 28 November 2012.Arnold J’s summary dismissal of an infringement claim based on a UK trade...
No items found.
Court of Appeal puts an end to lawyers creating confusion
29 November 2012
In Marks and Spencer Plc v Interflora Inc [2012] EWCA Civ 1501, the Court of Appeal has effectively killed off what was a common place practice of adducing favourable evidence of confusion (or lack...
No items found.
Needles in the UK Patents County Court
26 September 2012
Liversidge v (1) Owen Mumford Limited (2) Abbott Laboratories LimitedIn April 2011, the claimant commenced patent infringement proceedings in the UK Patents County Court (“PCC”) against the...
No items found.
High Court confirms that it is not fine for Spicerhaart to continue using “FINE”
25 September 2012
A recent decision of the High Court has brought to a conclusion a dispute between Fine & Country Limited (F&C) and Okotoks Limited (formerly Spicerhaart Limited and part of the Spicerhaart Group of...
No items found.
Stay in the Know
The UPC Newsletter
Get expert insights and the top patent stories delivered straight to your inbox.