Case Reports
UPC Case Reports
C-KORE v Novawell Follow-up to the evidence preservation order: Paris Local Division explains the rules for reviewing such an order
08 April 2024
Procedural order of 1 March 2024 (UPC_CFI_397/2023) As previously mentioned, C_KORE Systems Limited ("C_KORE") is the proprietor of the patent EP 2265793 relating to the testing of subsea apparatus...
#
UPC
#
Recent cases
#
Preservation of evidence
Joining a party
13 March 2024
Seoul Viosys., Ltd v Laser Components SAS (UPC_CFI_440/2023) Order dated 12 February 2024 (ORD_3311/2024) In this infringement case before the Paris Local Division the defendant, Laser Components...
#
UPC
#
Recent cases
#
Appeal
#
Intervention
#
Other procedural aspects
Looking out for the little guy: the UPC’s approach on ordering security for costs on SMEs
11 March 2024
Plant-e Knowledge B.V. & Plant-e B.V v. Arkyne Technologies S.L. (UPC_CFI_239/2023) Order delivered on 13 February 2024 (ORD_586897/2023) Background The proceedings in this case are an infringement...
#
UPC
#
Recent cases
#
Security for costs
Should a stay be ordered?
08 March 2024
10X Genomics, Inc. v Nanostring Technologies Inc. & Ors (UPC_CFI_2/2023; UPC_CoA_335/2023) Order of Court of Appeal on 26 February 2024 On 19 September 2023, the Munich Local Division issued a...
#
UPC
#
Recent cases
#
Appeal
#
Suspension (stay) of proceedings
Why did the Court of Appeal reverse the local division injunction in 10x Genomics vs Nanostring?
07 March 2024
In the first ever public hearing of the Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court, the provisional injunction obtained by 10x Genomics against NanoString during first instance proceedings has been...
#
UPC
#
Recent cases
#
Appeal
#
Inventive step
#
Provisional injunction
A caution on the availability of extensions
05 March 2024
ITCiCo Spain S.L. v Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaf (UPC_CFI_412/2023) Order dated 9 February 2024 (ORD_4804/2024) Background A revocation action was brought in the Paris Central Division...
#
UPC
#
Recent cases
#
Revocation
#
Time limits
Access to documents – representation
20 February 2024
Ocado v Autostore – appeal on access to documents UPC_CoA_404/2023 Order of 8 February 2024[1] In the Appeal by Ocado against the Order[2] from the Nordic Baltic regional division granting a request...
#
UPC
#
Recent cases
#
Access to documents
#
Representation
Financial penalties for disclosure of confidential information
14 February 2024
In this article we discuss two cases which address financial penalties for breach of confidentiality. Krauss-Maffei Extrusion GmbH v Troester GmbH & Co KG (UPC_CFI_181/2023) Order of 27 December 2023...
#
UPC
#
Recent cases
#
Confidentiality
#
Penalty payment
Discretionary review or appeal?
13 February 2024
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd v Netgear Inc & Ors (UPC_CFI_9/2023) Order of Court of Appeal on 11 January 2024 (UPC_CoA_486/2023); Appeal against ORD_588901/2023 dated 11 December 2023 Huawei sued...
#
UPC
#
Recent cases
#
Appeal
#
Other procedural aspects
Discretion allowing in expert declarations
09 February 2024
Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH & Ors v Amgen Inc (UPC_CFI_1/2023) Order dated 24 January 2024 (ORD_2233/2024) The pleadings in this revocation action had progressed to the rejoinder by defendant...
#
UPC
#
Recent cases
#
Evidence (expert)
#
Other procedural aspects
AARKE AB v SODASTREAM Industries Ltd., Order of 16 January 2024
05 February 2024
Background In a dispute between Aarke AB, a Swedish company, and SodaStream Industries Ltd, an Israeli company, Aarke, as the defendant to infringement proceedings, successfully applied to change the...
#
UPC
#
Recent cases
#
Language
Claim construction at the UPC
01 February 2024
For a European patent to be granted, the claims must be "clear and concise". However, some ambiguity or lack of clarity may be identified in granted claims, during infringement or invalidity...
#
UPC
#
Recent cases
#
Infringement
EX PARTE PI GRANTED
25 January 2024
Ortovox Sportartikel GmbH vs Mammut Sports Group AG and Mammut Sports Group GmbH Düsseldorf Local Division Order of 11 December 2023[1] Introduction Ortovox Sportartikel GmbH (in the following...
#
UPC
#
Recent cases
#
Infringement
#
Provisional injunction
Requirements for an intervention
23 January 2024
In the matter of an appeal by Ocado Innovation Limited and applications to intervene by (1) Mathys & Squire LLP and (2) Bristows (Ireland ) LLP Order of Court of Appeal dated 10 January 2024 By Order...
#
UPC
#
Recent cases
#
Intervention
C-KORE v Novawell: Paris local division grants evidence preservation order in subsea testing apparatus dispute
10 January 2024
Order of 14 November 2023 (ORD_587064/2023) This was another successful application for preserving evidence, following those in the Oerlikon v Himson, Oerlikon v Bhagat Group, Jozef Frans Nelissen v...
#
UPC
#
Recent cases
#
Infringement
Other Case Reports
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Online image searches for designs and marks
29 August 2013
An online image search tool for figurative trademarks and designs could be launched under new proposals by the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (OHIM).
No items found.
Design drawings: more than meets the eye
27 June 2013
A recent judgment handed down by Mr Justice Birss in Sealed Air Ltd v Sharp Interpack Ltd & Anor [2013] EWPCC 23 (30 May 2013) considers the way in which technical drawings in a registered design...
No items found.
Keywords that infringe – Interflora v M&S
19 June 2013
Interflora Inc & Anor v Marks and Spencer Plc & Anor [2013] EWHC 1291 (Ch)On 21 May, Mr Justice Arnold handed down a lengthy judgment in the long running action between Interflora and M&S.
No items found.
Swarovski’s marksman hits the right target – why Leica should define the correct problem to be solved
18 June 2013
Swarovski-Optik KG v Leica Camera AG [2013] EWHC 1227.SummaryAt the Patents Court before Vos J, Swarovski-Optik brought patent infringement proceedings against Leica Camera, who challenged the...
No items found.
When is an embryo an embryo?
29 May 2013
Despite recent guidance, the UK High Court has deemed it necessary to refer a question to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) that seeks to clarify what is meant by a “human embryo”,...
No items found.
Darren Smyth blogs for Spicy IP about Glivec decision
15 May 2013
In a guest post for the Spicy IP blog, partner Darren Smyth expands upon the issues raised in his earlier post for The IPKat about the decision of the Indian Supreme Court in denying Novartis a...
No items found.
Glivec decision raises issues over senior courts ruling in patent cases
10 May 2013
In his latest IPKat post, Darren Smyth “despairs” at the judgment by the Indian Supreme Court in the recent Glivec decision, refusing the patent application directed to imatinib mesylate in beta...
No items found.
Nestec SA & Ors v Dualit Ltd & Ors: Poisonous Priority
09 May 2013
Darren Smyth’s latest IPKat post is about the recent case of Nestec SA & Ors v Dualit Ltd & Ors concerning Nespresso coffee makers and their coffee capsules.
No items found.
Omnipharm v Merial – winner gets it spot-on
23 April 2013
In Omnipharm Limited v Merial [2013] EWCA Civ 2, the Court of Appeal of England and Wales (CA) upheld a first instance decision to revoke one of Merial’s patents on grounds of insufficiency.
No items found.
Resolution Chemicals Ltd v H. Lundbeck A/S: SPCs and privity
18 April 2013
Darren Smyth’s latest IPKat post concerns the recent decision on a preliminary point in Resolution Chemicals Ltd v H. Lundbeck A/S, and Lundbeck’s SPC for escitalopram.
No items found.
Three ways of improving the RCD system
15 April 2013
At a recent conference in Alicante to mark the tenth anniversary of the EU Registered Community Design, it was proposed by attendee Sir Robin Jacob to look at ways of improving the system.
No items found.
Have your say on IPO fast track trademark opposition procedure
15 April 2013
The Intellectual Property Office (IPO) has launched a public consultation on their plans for a simplified and more cost-effective trademark opposition procedure to run alongside the existing system.
No items found.
RCDs – use of dotted lines in representations
12 April 2013
In his capacity as regular blogger for The IPKat, Partner Darren Smyth has posted on the use of dotted lines in representations of designs. This follows his participation in the conference this week...
No items found.
So when is a patent claim too broad?
27 March 2013
In Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Genentech Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 93 the Court of Appeal dismissed the claimants’ appeal, rejecting all their arguments in respect of construction, infringement,...
No items found.
Alcon puts the brakes on patent protection for AP Racing due to added matter
25 March 2013
AP Racing Limited v Alcon Components Limited [2013] EWPCC 3Two rival suppliers of brake calipers used in racing cars in the motorsport industry recently went head to head in the Patents County Courts.
No items found.
Stay in the Know
The UPC Newsletter
Get expert insights and the top patent stories delivered straight to your inbox.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form. Please try again.