Recent cases > Access to documents
Showing
Applying Ocado, the UPC grants a R262 request to access CFI documents
NJOY Netherlands B.V v Juul Labs International, Inc (UPC_CFI_309/2023) Order issued 9 June 2025 (ORD_27305/2025) [1] The Paris Central Division revoked Juul Lab’s patent EP 3 498 115 B1 by decision dated 5th November 2024 (UPC CFI 309 /2023)....
Access to documents from revocation action
NJOY Netherlands B.V. v Juul Labs International, Inc. (UPC_CFI_316/2023); Application for access to documents by Nicoventures Trading Limited Order dated 24 April 2024 (ORD_587436/2023)[1] NJOY Netherlands B.V. (“NJOY”) applied to revok...
Composition of appeal panel and access to documents
Ocado Innovation Limited v Autostore AS & Others (UPC_CoA_404/2023) Order dated 10 April 2024 (ORD_19369/2024)[1] A member of the public requested access to documents under Rule 262.1(b) RoP in an action at Nordic Baltic Regional Division which...
Access to documents – representation
Ocado v Autostore – appeal on access to documents UPC_CoA_404/2023 Order of 8 February 2024[1] In the Appeal by Ocado against the Order[2] from the Nordic Baltic regional division granting a request under Rule 262.1(b) for inspection of the s...
UPC grants access to pleadings for the first time
Ocado Innovation Limited v Autostore AS & Others – Order of 17 October 2023 (ORD 543819/2023) In September we reported on two judgments by Munich Central Division refusing requests for access to documents under Rule 262.1(b) RoP. In each ca...
When can third parties obtain access to written pleadings and evidence at UPC?
A judge of the Central court in Munich has recently considered a request by a third party for access to written pleadings and evidence under Rule 262.1(b) in two cases. The judge first determined an access request in a revocation action filed by Sanofi...