Patent Box moves a step closer

No items found.
​
November 25, 2011

The Patent Box reaches another milestone. On the 6 December the Government will publish the draft legislation based on the public consultation in the light of its original proposals.

The Patent Box is a scheme offering favourable corporation tax treatment on profits arising from patented products and processes. Profits arising from such products and processes will be taxed at 10%, less than half the main corporation tax rate. It is intended to encourage companies to innovate and exploit their inventions in the UK, thus boosting the economy through the associated product development, manufacture and commercialisation. It is part of the Coalition’s drive to re-balance the economy away from financial services towards manufacturing.

The scheme is due to come into effect in tax year 2013/4, albeit that it will relate to patents which have been applied for prior to this date. We understand that the aim is to have the legislation passed by April 2012 so that companies will have one year to plan for the implementation of the new regime. Thus we can expect that the legislation presented on the 6 December will be very close to the final form although the exact wording may still be subject to refinement as it passes through Parliament.

What is already clear is that this new regime is likely to have a significant impact on how companies hold and exploit their patents going forward. Companies, especially those located in the UK, will be keen to ensure that they qualify for the tax relief. At the same time those companies which up to now have not looked to patents as a way of protecting their innovations, may well be advised to review this since the new regime will not apply to other forms of intellectual property.

EIP will be following developments of the Patent Box very closely. We will analyse the draft legislation when issued, with a view to advising clients on how they can take advantage of this tax break. Further information will be published in December.

Recent Case Reports

Invalidity of juicer patent upheld on appeal
03 November 2026
The Court of Appeal upheld the invalidity of Hurom’s juicer patent for lack of inventive step, while clarifying the admissibility requirements for patent amendments and the use of the unamended description when construing amended claims. It also confirmed the UPC’s jurisdiction over infringement in Poland despite Poland not being a UPCA Contracting Member State, but found that Hurom had failed to establish infringement under Polish law.
Evidence preservation doesn’t stretch to interrogation
03 November 2026
The Court of Appeal confirmed that evidence-preservation orders may be granted ex parte where there is a demonstrable risk that evidence could be destroyed or become unavailable, and that such orders may extend to relevant commercial and promotional documents. However, Art. 60 UPCA does not permit a bailiff or expert to question the defendant’s personnel on substantive technical matters, which must instead be handled under the Court’s control.
UPC Court of Appeal clarifies claim construction, the role of party experts, and provisional measures in direct-competition cases
03 November 2026
The CoA’s decision of 30 April 2025 in Insulet v EOFlow provides important guidance on claim construction, the role of party-appointed experts and the requirements for provisional injunctions.