ITMA Review: Court says no to sanskrit connection

No items found.
29 June 2015
Tags
Litigation

Sharon Daboul writes in the June 2015 issue of the ITMA Review on a recent decision by the CJEU which confirms the importance of considering all the relevant factors in an assessment of likelihood of confusion between two marks.

It also confirms that even when a mark has meaning to a part of the relevant public, where that meaning is not commonly understood it will not be significant to a conceptual comparison.

Related articles

EIP recognsied for strategic leadership in patent law at the Professional Services Management Excellence Awards
26 March 2026
EIP has been recognised with two Professional Services Management Excellence Awards 2026, including Excellence in Strategic Leadership and Best in Theme: Leadership. The awards reflect the firm’s commitment to aligning patent expertise with commercial insight, strengthening leadership across the firm and delivering patent strategy that supports investment, growth and high‑value business decisions.
EIP promotes Callum Docherty to Principal in the US
19 March 2026
EIP is pleased to announce the promotion of Callum Docherty to Principal, recognizing his substantial contribution to the firm’s international patent practice and his leadership within EIP’s growing US team.
EIP announces the promotion of Rob Barker to Partner
12 March 2026
EIP is pleased to announce the promotion of Robert Barker to Partner, recognising his significant contribution to the firm’s Digital, Chemistry, Life Sciences, and multidisciplinary patent practice since joining in 2014.