Patent Box claims reach £942.5 million

No items found.
​
October 1, 2018
No items found.
Table of contents
  • Toc Heading
  • Toc Heading

New preliminary data published by the UK Government for the tax year ending 2017 shows companies have saved a total of £942.5 million in tax relief by using Patent Box. When full results are published in 2019 this figure could even exceed £1 billion.

Patent Box is a UK Government scheme which allows companies to apply a lower rate of Corporation Tax on profits gained from patented inventions, from 19% to 10%. The Patent Box was introduced in 2013 to increase the level of patenting and development of IP created in the UK. The scheme also encourages companies to locate high-value jobs associated with the development of patents in the UK.

James Seymour, Partner at EIP, said: “Patent Box provides an incentive for UK companies to innovate in the UK, and to develop and commercialise their intellectual property globally. Data from the most recent complete financial year, 2015-16, shows that the benefits can be significant, with 1,160 companies using the Patent Box to claim an average of more than £650,000 relief. However, the Patent Box is not only for large companies, as those classed as small or medium accounted for almost half the total claimants, claiming on average more than £55,000 of tax relief each.”

Any UK company that owns and profits from a patented invention may be eligible to benefit from Patent Box, potentially saving them thousands of pounds in Corporation Tax. The savings achieved in tax relief may also offset the costs of the patenting process, making it potentially a sound investment for those considering filing for patent protection.

James added: “While it is clear that UK companies are taking notice of the Patent Box, with the total relief increasing significantly year-on-year, there are thousands more who are potentially missing out on the substantial savings available.”

If you would like to learn more about Patent Box and how it can help your business, visit our dedicated Patent Box website, Patentise, or contact James Seymour.

Recent Case Reports

See all Case Reports

UPC Court of appeal issues final decision, despite no finding on infringement at first instance
30 March 2026
In Rematec v Europe Forestry, the UPC Court of Appeal overturned the Mannheim Local Division’s revocation of the patent and, applying Article 75(1) UPCA, issued a final decision on both validity and infringement despite no infringement finding at first instance. The Court adopted a narrower, description‑led approach to claim interpretation, confirmed the patent’s validity, found infringement, and granted final remedies without referring the case back to the Court of First Instance.
​
Litigation insurance as security for costs
30 March 2026
In Syntorr v Arthrex, the UPC Court of Appeal clarified that while litigation insurance is not itself a form of security under Rule 158 RoP, it is a relevant factor when deciding whether security for costs should be ordered at all. By failing to consider the claimant’s insurance policy, the Munich Local Division wrongly exercised its discretion. The Court set aside the €2 million security order and confirmed that insurance can mitigate concerns about cost recoverability.
​
National law applies to claims for loss of profit if the events occurred before the UPC came into force
30 March 2026
In Fives v REEL, the Hamburg Local Division of the UPC dismissed a standalone damages action despite prior findings of infringement. Although the UPC was competent to assess damages, the court held that national law applied because the relevant events pre‑dated the UPC’s entry into force. Applying German law, the court found that the claimant had not proven causation or lost profit, highlighting the demanding evidentiary burden for price‑reduction damages claims and the importance of substantiating counterfactual tender outcomes.
​