Early statistics regarding interest in unitary patent protection

No items found.
​
August 4, 2023
#
UPC
Table of contents
  • Toc Heading
  • Toc Heading

The EPO has recently added ‘Requests for unitary effect' to its Statistics & Trends Centre. The Statistics & Trends Centre provides a dashboard that now gives information about requests for unitary effect, including the associated areas of technology, language of proceedings, translation language, and origin of the (first named) proprietor of the patents.

English is a popular language of proceedings at the EPO (around 70% of unitary patents derive from European patents granted in English), and proprietors are commonly choosing to translate into Spanish or German, having the choice to file a translation into any EU official language. For patent applications where the procedural language was not English (around 30% of unitary patents), filing an English translation is the only option available.

In terms of country of origin, the statistics can be normalised to reflect the different numbers of patent applications filed by proprietors from different countries. Comparing the ‘Origin of proprietors' statistics from the dashboard with the number of granted patents by country in 2022 (2023 statistics are not available at the time of writing), it seems that the unitary patent is relatively more popular with European applicants. Given the limited time since the launch of the unitary patent system, the data is likely to be a bit noisy at this stage and may not be representative of the ultimate distribution. However, as things stand, UK, German, French, Italian and Dutch applicants are requesting unitary patents at roughly twice the rate of US, Japanese, Korean and Chinese applicants.

One can only speculate on the reasons for this – perhaps European companies and attorneys are responding more quickly to the change in the local legal landscape because it feels more relevant to them. These statistics may change with time as the largest patent applicants adapt and respond to behaviour of competitors.

The Statistics and Trends centre can be found here.

Recent Case Reports

See all Case Reports

UPC Court of appeal issues final decision, despite no finding on infringement at first instance
30 March 2026
In Rematec v Europe Forestry, the UPC Court of Appeal overturned the Mannheim Local Division’s revocation of the patent and, applying Article 75(1) UPCA, issued a final decision on both validity and infringement despite no infringement finding at first instance. The Court adopted a narrower, description‑led approach to claim interpretation, confirmed the patent’s validity, found infringement, and granted final remedies without referring the case back to the Court of First Instance.
​
Litigation insurance as security for costs
30 March 2026
In Syntorr v Arthrex, the UPC Court of Appeal clarified that while litigation insurance is not itself a form of security under Rule 158 RoP, it is a relevant factor when deciding whether security for costs should be ordered at all. By failing to consider the claimant’s insurance policy, the Munich Local Division wrongly exercised its discretion. The Court set aside the €2 million security order and confirmed that insurance can mitigate concerns about cost recoverability.
​
National law applies to claims for loss of profit if the events occurred before the UPC came into force
30 March 2026
In Fives v REEL, the Hamburg Local Division of the UPC dismissed a standalone damages action despite prior findings of infringement. Although the UPC was competent to assess damages, the court held that national law applied because the relevant events pre‑dated the UPC’s entry into force. Applying German law, the court found that the claimant had not proven causation or lost profit, highlighting the demanding evidentiary burden for price‑reduction damages claims and the importance of substantiating counterfactual tender outcomes.
​