Download now: life sciences - whitepaper: building an investable ip portfolio
​

Geographic Scope of the UPC and Unitary Patent

No items found.
​
February 22, 2023
Additional information
Chevron icon
Info
Tags
UPC
Basic
Table of contents
Chevron icon
Table of contents
  • Toc Heading
  • Toc Heading

The grant of a European Patent allows patent rights to be obtained in respect of over 35 states by means of the respective validation procedures for those states. These include EU member states and non-EU states.

The scope of the UPC and a Unitary Patent corresponds to a subset of those EU member states. Currently, these are:

  • Austria (AT)*
  • Belgium (BE)*
  • Bulgaria (BG)
  • Denmark (DK)*
  • Estonia (EE)*
  • Finland (FI)*
  • France (FR)* _ UPC Central Division (Paris)
  • Germany (DE)* _ UPC Central Division (Munich)
  • Italy (IT)* _ UPC Central Division (Milan)
  • Latvia (LV)*
  • Lithuania (LT)*
  • Luxembourg (LU) _ UPC Court of Appeal
  • Malta (MT)
  • Netherlands (NL)*
  • Portugal (PL)*
  • Romania (with effect from 1 September 2024)
  • Slovenia (SI)*
  • Sweden (SE)*

*location of Local/Regional Divisions of the UPC

Note that the geographic coverage of a Unitary Patent is fixed at the grant date. Countries which signed up to participate in the unitary scheme after the grant date of a Unitary Patent are not included in the geographic scope.

This geographic scope of the UPC can vary over time as more states participate.

For a granted EP patent which is in force in any of the above states and which has not been opted_out, an action (e.g. infringement or revocation) in the UPC will be effective in respect of those states.

Proceedings for infringement in another state or for revocation of the national patent of any other state must be brought in the respective national court.

In the first nine months after grant, the EPO Opposition procedure provides a mechanism for centralised revocation for the entire bundle of all national patents (including those within the scope of the UPC) and any unitary patent resulting from a single granted EP patent.

To obtain protection in other EPC states, such as the UK, Poland or Spain, or where a Unitary Patent has not been requested, the existing validation procedures for obtaining national patent rights (which can be enforced in the respective national courts) remain unchanged.

Additional states which may participate in the future include Cyprus, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, and Slovakia. Of these, Ireland is the most likely to participate.

‍

‍

‍

‍

Recent Case Reports

See all Case Reports

Court of Appeal focuses on the technical effect to determine added matter
30 September 2026
The Court of Appeal provided guidance on their approach to assessing added subject matter, highlighting that the technical effect underlying the invention and how the claimed and unclaimed features contribute thereto is central to the analysis.
​
Court of Appeal affirms interpretation of product-by-process features in claims, and clarifies applicable law pre-June 2023
29 September 2026
The Court of Appeal confirmed that product-by-process features in a product claim limit the claim only where the specified process imparts characteristics that can be achieved solely by that process. It also clarified the law applicable to acts occurring before 1 June 2023, holding that UPC law may apply to ongoing infringement for injunctive relief, whereas damages for acts completed before that date are governed by national law, and that claims for provisional protection remain governed by national law.
​
Appeal reveals tricky deadlines for orders contained in decisions
29 September 2026
The Court of Appeal held that where a “privileged order” under Rule 220(1)(c), such as an order relating to the production of evidence under Article 59 UPCA and Rule 190 RoP, is contained within a decision on the merits, a 15 day appeal deadline for that order applies, separate from the substantive appeal deadline. Appeals challenging such orders after that deadline are inadmissible, and parties cannot circumvent the appeal rules by re-filing substantially the same request in the appeal proceedings.
​