Benefits for UK businesses as the Intellectual Property Act receives Royal Assent in the UK

No items found.
​
May 18, 2014

UK Intellectual Property law was enhanced last week when the Intellectual Property Act 2014 (IP Act) was given Royal Assent. It is expected that the IP Act’s provisions will start to come into force from 1 October 2014, with all measures implemented by late 2015.

According to the UK Intellectual Property Office, the IP Act has the objective of “modernising” Intellectual Property law to help UK businesses better protect their IP rights in the UK and abroad. The IP Act is part of the government’s aim to support business in driving economic growth and encouraging innovation.

The main changes to the law are anticipated as follows:

Designs:

  • The IP Act will make the intentional copying of registered designs in the course of business a criminal offence. This brings design rights into line with trademark and copyright protection.
  • The default owner of a design will be the designer, and not the third-party commissioner. This will bring the UK into line with EU law and copyright law. Designers will own the rights to their design, unless a contractual agreement has been set up between the designer and commissioner.
  • The law on unregistered design rights will be simplified.

Patents:

  • The IP Act will help the UK to establish the Unified Patent Court, which will be part-based in London. This is key to the introduction of a single patent across almost the entire European Union (currently, 25 Member States are involved).
  • The IP Act will allow the UK IPO to share information on unpublished patent applications with other national patent offices to help clear existing backlogs and speed up the patent-granting process.
  • Patent holders will be able to mark their patented products with a relevant internet link instead of patent numbers.

If you have any questions about how the new law will affect you and your business, contact your EIP attorney.

By Sharon Daboul

Recent Case Reports

Invalidity of juicer patent upheld on appeal
03 November 2026
The Court of Appeal upheld the invalidity of Hurom’s juicer patent for lack of inventive step, while clarifying the admissibility requirements for patent amendments and the use of the unamended description when construing amended claims. It also confirmed the UPC’s jurisdiction over infringement in Poland despite Poland not being a UPCA Contracting Member State, but found that Hurom had failed to establish infringement under Polish law.
Evidence preservation doesn’t stretch to interrogation
03 November 2026
The Court of Appeal confirmed that evidence-preservation orders may be granted ex parte where there is a demonstrable risk that evidence could be destroyed or become unavailable, and that such orders may extend to relevant commercial and promotional documents. However, Art. 60 UPCA does not permit a bailiff or expert to question the defendant’s personnel on substantive technical matters, which must instead be handled under the Court’s control.
UPC Court of Appeal clarifies claim construction, the role of party experts, and provisional measures in direct-competition cases
03 November 2026
The CoA’s decision of 30 April 2025 in Insulet v EOFlow provides important guidance on claim construction, the role of party-appointed experts and the requirements for provisional injunctions.