REGISTER now: Visser ai webinar - BEYOND THE HYPE: AI IN PATENT PROSECUTION
​

EIP Trademark team recognised by WTR 1000 2021

No items found.
​
February 16, 2021
Additional information
Chevron icon
Info
Tags
Trademarking
Table of contents
Chevron icon
Table of contents
  • Toc Heading
  • Toc Heading

EIP has been highlighted as one of the world’s leading trademark specialists in the 2021 edition of WTR 1000.

Researchers for WTR 1000, published annually by World Trademark Review, references EIP’s international offices which puts it at a distinct advantage on cross-border trademark protection and litigation assignments. The team is noted for its clear communication and knowledge sharing between its various offices ensure a seamless service without limits.

Head of Brands Claire Lehr is noted as providing “critical information along with long-range strategic guidance regarding the protection of existing brand assets and the development of new ones”.

WTR 1000 notes that Claire and fellow partner Paula Flutter form a great team, with valuable contributions from seasoned associate Nora Fowler.

Recent Case Reports

See all Case Reports

Invalidity of juicer patent upheld on appeal
03 November 2026
The Court of Appeal upheld the invalidity of Hurom’s juicer patent for lack of inventive step, while clarifying the admissibility requirements for patent amendments and the use of the unamended description when construing amended claims. It also confirmed the UPC’s jurisdiction over infringement in Poland despite Poland not being a UPCA Contracting Member State, but found that Hurom had failed to establish infringement under Polish law.
​
Evidence preservation doesn’t stretch to interrogation
03 November 2026
The Court of Appeal confirmed that evidence-preservation orders may be granted ex parte where there is a demonstrable risk that evidence could be destroyed or become unavailable, and that such orders may extend to relevant commercial and promotional documents. However, Art. 60 UPCA does not permit a bailiff or expert to question the defendant’s personnel on substantive technical matters, which must instead be handled under the Court’s control.
​
UPC Court of Appeal clarifies claim construction, the role of party experts, and provisional measures in direct-competition cases
03 November 2026
The CoA’s decision of 30 April 2025 in Insulet v EOFlow provides important guidance on claim construction, the role of party-appointed experts and the requirements for provisional injunctions.
​