Glivec decision raises issues over senior courts ruling in patent cases

No items found.
May 10, 2013
#
Litigation
#
Life

In his latest IPKat post, Darren Smyth “despairs” at the judgment by the Indian Supreme Court in the recent Glivec decision, refusing the patent application directed to imatinib mesylate in beta crystalline form.

Darren says the Court’s failure to understand novelty is an example of what can happen when non-specialist senior courts rule on specialised areas of law.

Related articles

Online image searches for designs and marks
29 August 2013
An online image search tool for figurative trademarks and designs could be launched under new proposals by the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (OHIM).
Design drawings: more than meets the eye
27 June 2013
A recent judgment handed down by Mr Justice Birss in Sealed Air Ltd v Sharp Interpack Ltd & Anor [2013] EWPCC 23 (30 May 2013) considers the way in which technical drawings in a registered design...
Keywords that infringe – Interflora v M&S
19 June 2013
Interflora Inc & Anor v Marks and Spencer Plc & Anor [2013] EWHC 1291 (Ch)On 21 May, Mr Justice Arnold handed down a lengthy judgment in the long running action between Interflora and M&S.