REGISTER now: Sweden Event - A new era for innovation: AI, the UPC and global patent opportunities
​

UK Government confirms Patent Box scheme

No items found.
​
March 27, 2012
Additional information
Chevron icon
Info
Tags
Life
Patent Strategy
Table of contents
Chevron icon
Table of contents
  • Toc Heading
  • Toc Heading

Chancellor George Osborne confirmed in his 2012 Budget that the proposed Patent Box scheme will go ahead.

When fully phased in, the rate of Corporation Tax on profits attributed to patents will be 10%. This is coupled with a reduction in the basic rate of Corporation Tax from its current level of 26% to 24% from April 2012 and to 22% from April 2013.

The Patent Box is intended to encourage companies to base their R&D and manufacturing operations within the UK by making the country more competitive with other European countries.

The confirmation of the Patent Box was a contributing factor in GSK announcing on 22 March that it would be investing £500m across its UK manufacturing sites to increase production of key active ingredients for its pharmaceutical products and vaccines. This will result in the creation of up to 1,000 new jobs and include the location of a new manufacturing facility at Ulverston in Cumbria.

GSK’s CEO Sir Andrew Witty said: “The introduction of the Patent Box has transformed the way in which we view the UK as a location for new investments, ensuring that the medicines of the future will not only be discovered, but can also continue to be made here in Britain.”

EIP can advise on the IP strategy considerations for gaining the most benefit from the Patent Box. Click here to read our guidance note or contact our IP strategists.

Recent Case Reports

See all Case Reports

Court of Appeal focuses on the technical effect to determine added matter
30 September 2026
The Court of Appeal provided guidance on their approach to assessing added subject matter, highlighting that the technical effect underlying the invention and how the claimed and unclaimed features contribute thereto is central to the analysis.
​
Court of Appeal affirms interpretation of product-by-process features in claims, and clarifies applicable law pre-June 2023
29 September 2026
The Court of Appeal confirmed that product-by-process features in a product claim limit the claim only where the specified process imparts characteristics that can be achieved solely by that process. It also clarified the law applicable to acts occurring before 1 June 2023, holding that UPC law may apply to ongoing infringement for injunctive relief, whereas damages for acts completed before that date are governed by national law, and that claims for provisional protection remain governed by national law.
​
Appeal reveals tricky deadlines for orders contained in decisions
29 September 2026
The Court of Appeal held that where a “privileged order” under Rule 220(1)(c), such as an order relating to the production of evidence under Article 59 UPCA and Rule 190 RoP, is contained within a decision on the merits, a 15 day appeal deadline for that order applies, separate from the substantive appeal deadline. Appeals challenging such orders after that deadline are inadmissible, and parties cannot circumvent the appeal rules by re-filing substantially the same request in the appeal proceedings.
​