REGISTER now: Visser ai webinar - BEYOND THE HYPE: AI IN PATENT PROSECUTION
​

Geographic Scope of the UPC and Unitary Patent

No items found.
​
February 22, 2023
Additional information
Chevron icon
Info
Tags
UPC
Basic
Table of contents
Chevron icon
Table of contents
  • Toc Heading
  • Toc Heading

The grant of a European Patent allows patent rights to be obtained in respect of over 35 states by means of the respective validation procedures for those states. These include EU member states and non-EU states.

The scope of the UPC and a Unitary Patent corresponds to a subset of those EU member states. Currently, these are:

  • Austria (AT)*
  • Belgium (BE)*
  • Bulgaria (BG)
  • Denmark (DK)*
  • Estonia (EE)*
  • Finland (FI)*
  • France (FR)* _ UPC Central Division (Paris)
  • Germany (DE)* _ UPC Central Division (Munich)
  • Italy (IT)* _ UPC Central Division (Milan)
  • Latvia (LV)*
  • Lithuania (LT)*
  • Luxembourg (LU) _ UPC Court of Appeal
  • Malta (MT)
  • Netherlands (NL)*
  • Portugal (PL)*
  • Romania (with effect from 1 September 2024)
  • Slovenia (SI)*
  • Sweden (SE)*

*location of Local/Regional Divisions of the UPC

Note that the geographic coverage of a Unitary Patent is fixed at the grant date. Countries which signed up to participate in the unitary scheme after the grant date of a Unitary Patent are not included in the geographic scope.

This geographic scope of the UPC can vary over time as more states participate.

For a granted EP patent which is in force in any of the above states and which has not been opted_out, an action (e.g. infringement or revocation) in the UPC will be effective in respect of those states.

Proceedings for infringement in another state or for revocation of the national patent of any other state must be brought in the respective national court.

In the first nine months after grant, the EPO Opposition procedure provides a mechanism for centralised revocation for the entire bundle of all national patents (including those within the scope of the UPC) and any unitary patent resulting from a single granted EP patent.

To obtain protection in other EPC states, such as the UK, Poland or Spain, or where a Unitary Patent has not been requested, the existing validation procedures for obtaining national patent rights (which can be enforced in the respective national courts) remain unchanged.

Additional states which may participate in the future include Cyprus, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, and Slovakia. Of these, Ireland is the most likely to participate.

‍

‍

‍

‍

Recent Case Reports

See all Case Reports

Invalidity of juicer patent upheld on appeal
03 November 2026
The Court of Appeal upheld the invalidity of Hurom’s juicer patent for lack of inventive step, while clarifying the admissibility requirements for patent amendments and the use of the unamended description when construing amended claims. It also confirmed the UPC’s jurisdiction over infringement in Poland despite Poland not being a UPCA Contracting Member State, but found that Hurom had failed to establish infringement under Polish law.
​
Evidence preservation doesn’t stretch to interrogation
03 November 2026
The Court of Appeal confirmed that evidence-preservation orders may be granted ex parte where there is a demonstrable risk that evidence could be destroyed or become unavailable, and that such orders may extend to relevant commercial and promotional documents. However, Art. 60 UPCA does not permit a bailiff or expert to question the defendant’s personnel on substantive technical matters, which must instead be handled under the Court’s control.
​
UPC Court of Appeal clarifies claim construction, the role of party experts, and provisional measures in direct-competition cases
03 November 2026
The CoA’s decision of 30 April 2025 in Insulet v EOFlow provides important guidance on claim construction, the role of party-appointed experts and the requirements for provisional injunctions.
​