British Medical Journal: Pregabalin patent litigation and its implications

No items found.
​
08 June 2018
Tags
Litigation
Life

The British Medical Journal has published two papers co-authored by Darren Smyth on the wide-ranging implications of the patent litigation related to the drug pregabalin.

The first paper explains the arguments over the patent case and its impact for the NHS. In particular, the paper analyses the conflict between generic prescribing as a near-universal practice in the UK, and the policing of second medical use patents. Darren’s co-authors were Ben Goldacre and Richard Croker of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine at Oxford University, where Darren is an honorary research fellow.

The second paper focuses on the impact on the prescribing patterns of clinicians before, during, and after the litigation and expiry of the patent, as well as the financial cost to the NHS, and is additionally co-authored by Alex Walker of the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine.

Related articles

EIP strengthens Swedish presence with dedicated Malmö office
10 November 2026
EIP has strengthened its presence in Sweden with a dedicated Malmö office, reflecting the continued growth of our team in southern Sweden. The Malmö team supports innovative businesses with intellectual property expertise, helping them protect their ideas and maximise their commercial value.
EIP named in The Times Best Law Firms for a second year running
05 November 2026
EIP have been named in The Times Best Law Firms 2027 and commended for intellectual property, for the second consecutive year.
EIP ranked Band 1 in Chambers UK 2027, with three lawyers also recognised
14 October 2026
Chambers recognised EIP for its patent litigation work and its strength in disputes concerning FRAND licensing and standard essential patents.