€325 million Funding for Semiconductor Research and Innovation in the UK and the EU

​
Tom Swift
​
Andrew Thompson
​
July 9, 2024
#
Ampliphy
#
Digital
#
Patenting
Table of contents
  • Toc Heading
  • Toc Heading

Europe's Chips Joint Undertaking has bolstered its support for the semiconductor industry by announcing three funding calls with a combined value of up to €325M. The funding calls are to create: a pilot line for photonic integrated circuits (PICs), semiconductor chip competency centres, and a cloud-based design platform. As the UK is part of the Chips Joint Undertaking, the funding is available to both EU and UK companies.

This first funding call is up to €180M for pilot lines for the development, testing, and small-scale production of PICs. This aims to facilitate companies making the treacherous leap "from lab to fab". The up to €120M of funding for chip competency centres aims to provide access to expertise and facilities for experiments. These services are primarily for start-ups and SMEs and will reduce the barrier-to-entry for small companies. Further, the centres will augment the development and design capabilities of existing companies. The design platform funding is up to €25M to create a cloud-based platform for semiconductor chip design. To enhance collaboration and support smaller companies without the capacity to develop their own in-house platform, the design platform will be open access.

This funding will reenforce Europe's strong community of PIC companies and provide opportunities to produce valuable IP. Much of the innovation and creation will be collaborative and state-sponsored. Whilst this can dramatically increase the output of these projects, it also places rights-holders in a minefield of joint development agreements, joint ownership, and licensing agreements. The EU often directs companies to co-ownership of IP. Whilst this can initially provide a simple solution, co-ownership often proves problematic later. For example, when an owner wants to sell or licence their IP, deals can be hamstrung by co-owners. It will be important for companies to carefully consider IP before undertaking such projects. Having an effective IP strategy and IP agreements in place before collaboration and innovation starts will prove vital in the long-term success of such projects - even when dealing with open access or open-source platforms.

Companies can apply for funding through the Chips Joint Undertaking's website. The deadline to apply for funding for the PIC pilot line, the competence centres, and the design platform are 5pm CEST on 17 September 2024, 2 October 2024, and 10 October 2024 respectively.

This funding is part of the Chips for Europe initiative under the Chips Act see Andrew Thompson's article on the EU Chips Act here.

Recent Case Reports

See all Case Reports

UPC Court of appeal issues final decision, despite no finding on infringement at first instance
30 March 2026
In Rematec v Europe Forestry, the UPC Court of Appeal overturned the Mannheim Local Division’s revocation of the patent and, applying Article 75(1) UPCA, issued a final decision on both validity and infringement despite no infringement finding at first instance. The Court adopted a narrower, description‑led approach to claim interpretation, confirmed the patent’s validity, found infringement, and granted final remedies without referring the case back to the Court of First Instance.
​
Litigation insurance as security for costs
30 March 2026
In Syntorr v Arthrex, the UPC Court of Appeal clarified that while litigation insurance is not itself a form of security under Rule 158 RoP, it is a relevant factor when deciding whether security for costs should be ordered at all. By failing to consider the claimant’s insurance policy, the Munich Local Division wrongly exercised its discretion. The Court set aside the €2 million security order and confirmed that insurance can mitigate concerns about cost recoverability.
​
National law applies to claims for loss of profit if the events occurred before the UPC came into force
30 March 2026
In Fives v REEL, the Hamburg Local Division of the UPC dismissed a standalone damages action despite prior findings of infringement. Although the UPC was competent to assess damages, the court held that national law applied because the relevant events pre‑dated the UPC’s entry into force. Applying German law, the court found that the claimant had not proven causation or lost profit, highlighting the demanding evidentiary burden for price‑reduction damages claims and the importance of substantiating counterfactual tender outcomes.
​