Michael Nielsen

Of Counsel, UK and European Patent Attorney
London
mnielsen@eip.com

Biography

As a patent attorney with more than a decade of experience in patent law and a strong technical background in physics and software, Michael is able to provide clear and comprehensive advice on complex patent matters in high-tech industries.

Michael's work spans patent preparation and prosecution as well as contentious matters before the Unified Patent Court (UPC) and the opposition divisions and Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office. He has already been active before the UPC, and regularly advises clients on related matters, in particular on substantive law issues such as infringement and validity of European patents.

Before qualifying as a patent attorney, Michael studied physics at Imperial College London, graduating with a Master’s degree in Physics with Theoretical Physics. During his studies he focused on computational physics, which led to an ongoing interest in software development. In recent years, this technical background has been put to good use when advising on matters in the fields of optics and photonics, microfabrication, quantum computing, mechanical engineering, video gaming, and video/audio streaming.

Michael begain his career at a leading London IP firm, where he trained and qualified as a UK and European Patent Attorney. In 2019 he moved to Finland, where he held a senior position at at top-tier Finnish IP firm before joining EIP in 2025. His work before the European Patent Office has been recognised in the IAM 1000 guide, where he is one of a small number of patent attorneys recommended in the EPO category. He has also been recognised by IP Stars as a “Rising Star” and “Notable Practitioner”.

Recent Work
Publications
Education
  • Postgraduate Certificate in Intellectual Property Law - Queen Mary University of London (2013)
  • Master in Science, Physics with Theoretical Physics - Imperial College London (2012)
Languages Spoken
Career History
  • Partner at Berggren Oy (2022 — 2025)
  • European & UK Patent Attorney at Boco IP Oy AB (2019 — 2022)
  • Technical Assistant / Associate at Carpmaels & Ransford LLP (2012 — 2019)
Specialisms
  • Digital: Applied maths & cryptography, Applied physics, Digital health, Electromechanical systems, Gaming and graphics, Medical imaging, Photonics and optics, Quantum computing, Semiconductors, Software, Video codecs
  • Dynamics: Electromechanical systems, Mechanics, Thermodynamics
  • HealthTech: Additive manufacturing, Digital health, Medical devices, Medical imaging, Personalised healthcare, Surgical tools and implants
Awards

The latest from

Michael Nielsen

UPC takes strict approach on costs reimbursement
30 October 2025
Insulet v. EOFlow UPC_CFI_773/2025 and UPC_CFI 774/2025 (Milan CD), decision of 15 October 2025[1] The dispute began when Insulet sought a provisional injunction against EOFlow to prevent...
UPC Considers but does not decide exhaustion of rights in relation to consumables
30 October 2025
Brita v. Aquashield UPC CFI 248/2024 (Munich LD), decision of 22 August 2025[1] UPC CFI 564/2024 (Munich LD), decision of 16 October 2025[2] Brita sued Aquashield and others for infringement of...
UPC Infringement Actions: Is Speed Meeting Expectations?
23 September 2025
The Unified Patent Court promised simplified and faster patent litigation across Europe. Two years in, we look at whether it’s delivering on that promise. For patent holders and defendants alike, the duration of infringement actions can significantly impact market strategies, investment decisions, and competitive positioning. In this article, we set out an in-depth analysis of how the court’s procedural rules are shaping the pace of litigation. By examining key milestones—from the filing of an infringement action to the issuance of a final judgment—we assess whether the UPC is delivering on its promise of efficiency.

Contact us

Please complete the form below and we will be in touch shortly.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form. Please try again.