JIPLP: So when is a patent claim too broad?

No items found.
01 July 2013
Tags
Litigation
Life

The Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice has published an article by Andrew Sharples and Carissa Kendall-Palmer about the Court of Appeal’s decision in Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Genentech Inc.

This ruling confirms that a broad claim in a patent encompassing a large number of unexemplified embodiments can be valid and enforceable.

To read the JIPLP article in full, click here.

Related articles

EIP recognsied for strategic leadership in patent law at the Professional Services Management Excellence Awards
26 March 2026
EIP has been recognised with two Professional Services Management Excellence Awards 2026, including Excellence in Strategic Leadership and Best in Theme: Leadership. The awards reflect the firm’s commitment to aligning patent expertise with commercial insight, strengthening leadership across the firm and delivering patent strategy that supports investment, growth and high‑value business decisions.
EIP promotes Callum Docherty to Principal in the US
19 March 2026
EIP is pleased to announce the promotion of Callum Docherty to Principal, recognizing his substantial contribution to the firm’s international patent practice and his leadership within EIP’s growing US team.
EIP announces the promotion of Rob Barker to Partner
12 March 2026
EIP is pleased to announce the promotion of Robert Barker to Partner, recognising his significant contribution to the firm’s Digital, Chemistry, Life Sciences, and multidisciplinary patent practice since joining in 2014.