ITMA Review: Court says no to sanskrit connection

No items found.
​
29 June 2015
Tags
Litigation
Table of contents
  • Toc Heading
  • Toc Heading

Sharon Daboul writes in the June 2015 issue of the ITMA Review on a recent decision by the CJEU which confirms the importance of considering all the relevant factors in an assessment of likelihood of confusion between two marks.

It also confirms that even when a mark has meaning to a part of the relevant public, where that meaning is not commonly understood it will not be significant to a conceptual comparison.

Related articles

See all articles

EIP Recognised in The Times Best Law Firms 2026
03 December 2025
EIP is proud to be featured in The Times Best Law Firms 2026, a prestigious list based on peer recommendations across the legal industry. This recognition highlights EIP’s commitment to technical excellence, client-focused service, and innovative IP strategies. From high-value patent litigation to strategic portfolio management, EIP continues to deliver results that matter for clients in technology, life sciences, and engineering. This accolade reinforces our position as a trusted leader in intellectual property law.
​
EIP Launches Tech & AI Function to Drive Innovation and Client Excellence
06 November 2025
When it comes to technology, EIP has always been ahead of the curve; we are proud to announce the evolution of our IT department into a dedicated Tech & AI function, marking a bold step towards...
​
EIP shortlisted for The British Legal Awards 2025
26 September 2025
We are proud to share that we've been shortlisted for The British Legal Awards 2025 in the newly introduced category: ‘IP Team of the Year'! A special shout-out to our fantastic Litigation team,...
​