ITMA Review: Court says no to sanskrit connection

No items found.
​
29 June 2015
Tags
Litigation

Sharon Daboul writes in the June 2015 issue of the ITMA Review on a recent decision by the CJEU which confirms the importance of considering all the relevant factors in an assessment of likelihood of confusion between two marks.

It also confirms that even when a mark has meaning to a part of the relevant public, where that meaning is not commonly understood it will not be significant to a conceptual comparison.

Related articles

EIP strengthens Swedish presence with dedicated Malmö office
10 November 2026
EIP has strengthened its presence in Sweden with a dedicated Malmö office, reflecting the continued growth of our team in southern Sweden. The Malmö team supports innovative businesses with intellectual property expertise, helping them protect their ideas and maximise their commercial value.
EIP named in The Times Best Law Firms for a second year running
05 November 2026
EIP have been named in The Times Best Law Firms 2027 and commended for intellectual property, for the second consecutive year.
EIP ranked Band 1 in Chambers UK 2027, with three lawyers also recognised
14 October 2026
Chambers recognised EIP for its patent litigation work and its strength in disputes concerning FRAND licensing and standard essential patents.