News Flashes

Showing

Patent Dispute Resolved: JGL's Hoist Not Infringing

Jeff Gosling Limited (“JGL”) sued Autochair Limited in the IPEC for a declaration of non-infringement concerning its “Apex Assist” hoist and Autochair’s patent, which covers a particular set-up of a hoist for lifting wheel...

AI and Bitstreams at the Core of China’s Patent Update

On April 30, 2025, the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) released a draft amendment of the Patent Examination Guidelines (for public comment), proposing further revisions to the current Guidelines, which only came into effect ...

Exploring IP in a Space Sector Product

Introduction Innovative space sector businesses generate IP all the time. But it can be difficult to appreciate the range of IP being generated, or the value of that IP. In order to help illustrate, we’ve come up with a space sector product o...

Costs assessment following interim measures at UPC

SSAB Swedish Steel GmbH & SSAB Europe Oy v Tiroler Rohre GmbH (UPC_CFI_640/2024) Orders of 10 February 2025 (Order nos. ORD_68941/2024[1] and ORD_65844/2024[2]) This is a decision on the determination of costs. Following the withdrawal by Tirol...

Related actions filed in different UPC divisions

biolitec Holding GmbH & Co. KG v Light Guide Optics Germany GmbH, S.I.A. LIGHTGUIDE International (UPC_CFI_714/2024) Order of 12 February 2025 (ORD_68717/2024[1]) On 20 November 2024, the Claimant filed an infringement action against the Defend...

Prevayl v Whoop [2025] EWHC 399 (IPEC)

His Honour Judge Hacon has found that Prevayl’s patent for a smart bra was invalid for obviousness over two pieces of prior art. However, had the patent been valid, Whoop would be indirectly infringing the patent by the sale of its “Whoop b...

Subscribe to The Patent Strategist newsletter

Thank you for your interest.

Subscribe to The Patent Strategist newsletter

Get expert insights and the top patent stories delivered straight to your inbox.