The UPC
Hub

Case reports, trends, insights and the litigators behind them, in one place.

Link copied

Ready for the UPC long before it opened.

We have run patent litigation across the UK and Germany for well over a decade. When the UPC opened in June 2023, our Uniphy team was ready from day one.

Our litigators and patent attorneys work as one team across UPC, UK and German proceedings.

Tap a year to explore

Established UK and German litigation practices

  • Built experience across electronics, telecoms, pharma and medtech
  • Integrated patent attorneys and litigators

Ran major cross-border actions across the UK and Germany

  • Handled FRAND, SEP and multi-jurisdictional disputes
  • Prepared for pan-European litigation long before the UPC existed

UPC goes live and we launch Uniphy

  • 40 UPC Representatives at launch
  • Seamless transition into UPC litigation from day one
Outcomes

How UPC cases turn out

View more UPC statistics

The results of decided cases, with the median time the Court took. Hover or tab through the lists to explore.

Case reports

Read what the Court is deciding

Tags
No tags match that search.
Court
No courts match that search.
Sector
No sectors match that search.
0 of 100
Case Reports
Tag
Clear all
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
​
Tag
:
Tag

Another day, another interim injunction granted by the UK High Court: Boehringer Ingelheim find success against Dr Reddy

04 December 2025
2025-12-04

Boehringer Ingelheim successfully obtained another interim injunction from the UK High Court against Dr Reddy, reinforcing its patent rights in ongoing pharmaceutical litigation. The article outlines the case details, the court’s reasoning, and what this decision means for patent enforcement in the UK.

#
Basic
No items found.
No items found.
​

When is a managing director an accomplice to patent infringement?

26 November 2025
2025-11-26

#
UPC
#
Infringement
#
Other procedural aspects
No items found.
No items found.
​

Court of Appeal of the UPC considers post-filed experimental data irrelevant to claim construction

25 November 2025
2025-11-25

#
Recent cases
#
UPC
#
Claim interpretation
No items found.
No items found.
​

Auxiliary claim requests inadmissible and indicative of likely invalidity in applications for provisional measures.

25 November 2025
2025-11-25

The UPC’s Munich Local Division denied Onward Medical’s bid for a preliminary injunction against Niche Biomedical, finding serious doubts over the novelty of the granted claim of EP 3 421 081 B1 in light of the Yoo prior art. The court also rejected all eight auxiliary claim requests, holding that amended claims cannot be used to establish likely validity in provisional‑measures proceedings. The decision reinforces that interim relief is only available for patents that appear robust in their granted form.

#
Recent cases
#
UPC
#
Permanent injunction
No items found.
No items found.
​

UPC continues the Mushroom Saga with decision by default

20 November 2025
2025-11-20

#
UPC
#
Recent cases
#
Infringement
No items found.
No items found.
​

No Declaration of Non-Infringement for Alternative Product

12 November 2025
2025-11-12

The Unified Patent Court rejected Black Sheep’s request for a declaration of non-infringement (DNI) for an alternative product design. The court found the request inadmissible because HL Display had not asserted infringement against the alternative design, and Black Sheep had not formally sought acknowledgment of non-infringement before filing the counterclaim.

#
Infringement
#
UPC
#
Recent cases
No items found.
No items found.
​

UPC sets out Guidelines for Penalty Payments

04 November 2025
2025-11-04

Kodak v. Fujifilm (UPC CoA 699/2025, order of 14 October 2025)[1] According to Art. 82(2) UPCA and Rule 354.3 RoP, a party may be sanctioned with a recurring penalty payment, payable to the UPC, if...

#
UPC
#
Recent cases
#
Penalty payment
No items found.
No items found.
​

UPC takes strict approach on costs reimbursement

30 October 2025
2025-10-30

Insulet v. EOFlow UPC_CFI_773/2025 and UPC_CFI 774/2025 (Milan CD), decision of 15 October 2025[1] The dispute began when Insulet sought a provisional injunction against EOFlow to prevent...

#
UPC
#
Recent cases
#
Costs
No items found.
No items found.
​

UPC Considers but does not decide exhaustion of rights in relation to consumables

30 October 2025
2025-10-30

Brita v. Aquashield UPC CFI 248/2024 (Munich LD), decision of 22 August 2025[1] UPC CFI 564/2024 (Munich LD), decision of 16 October 2025[2] Brita sued Aquashield and others for infringement of...

#
UPC
#
Recent cases
#
Infringement
No items found.
No items found.
​

Apple Intervenes in Confidentiality Appeals: UPC Court of Appeal Allows Intervention in Ericsson and Sun Patent Trust Cases

30 September 2025
2025-09-30

Apple (Intervener) in Ericsson v. AsusTek and Apple (Intervener) in Sun Patent Trust v. Vivo UPC_CoA_631/2025[1], UPC_CoA_632/2025[2], UPC_CoA_755/2025[3], and UPC_CoA_757/2025[4] – Orders of 23...

#
UPC
#
Recent cases
#
Confidentiality
#
Intervention
No items found.
No items found.
​

UPC Infringement Actions: Is Speed Meeting Expectations?

23 September 2025
2025-09-23

The Unified Patent Court promised simplified and faster patent litigation across Europe. Two years in, we look at whether it’s delivering on that promise. For patent holders and defendants alike, the duration of infringement actions can significantly impact market strategies, investment decisions, and competitive positioning. In this article, we set out an in-depth analysis of how the court’s procedural rules are shaping the pace of litigation. By examining key milestones—from the filing of an infringement action to the issuance of a final judgment—we assess whether the UPC is delivering on its promise of efficiency.

#
UPC
#
Recent cases
No items found.
No items found.
​

Does an ongoing phase 3 clinical trial and its published protocol suggest that the tested drug will be successful?

18 September 2025
2025-09-18

Summary A recent EPO Boards of Appeal decision, T 0136/24, has examined the issue of "reasonable expectation of success" when the prior art discloses a protocol to an ongoing phase 3 clinical trial.

#
EPO
No items found.
No items found.
​

When “better” isn’t good enough under Art. 84 EPC

18 September 2025
2025-09-18

In the recent Decision T 2387/22, the Board's key message was: if you define an invention by a "relative improvement" of a known technical effect, the improvement must be expressed in "objectively...

#
Stratiphy
#
Life
#
Patenting
#
EPO
No items found.
No items found.
​

UPC Agreement Is Not EU Law, No Referrals to CJEU

01 September 2025
2025-09-01

expert v. Seoul Viosys, UPC_CoA_380/2025 Order of 20 August 2025 (ORD_22147/2025)[1] This order from the UPC Court of Appeal clearly states that the Court of Justice of the EU cannot be asked to...

#
UPC
#
Recent cases
#
Appeal
#
Other procedural aspects
No items found.
No items found.
​

Unconventional Service: igus v. Whale Technology

29 August 2025
2025-08-29

UPC_CFI_318/2025, decision of 5 August 2025 (ORD_34299/2025)[1] In a default judgment issued by the Düsseldorf Local Division of the Unified Patent Court, Whale Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.

#
UPC
#
Recent cases
#
Service of actions
No items found.
No items found.
​
No results found.
Please try updating your search criteria.
Speak to an expert

Meet our UPC team

Our team includes leading Attorneys-at-Law in Germany, technically skilled European patent attorneys, and highly reputed UK solicitors with experience in some of the largest European patent cases. With specialists based in Germany, Sweden (home to the UPC’s only regional division), and the UK (Europe’s largest litigation venue outside the UPC), we field formidable teams tailored to each case.

Our attorneys have worked together successfully for many years, enabling us to respond quickly and intelligently under the UPC’s tight timelines and new procedures. We offer clients a single point of contact for co-ordinated, cross-border litigation support.

‍

Christof Höhne
Partner, Rechtsanwalt, UPC Representative
Jerome Spaargaren
Partner, UK and European Patent Attorney, UPC Representative
Matthew Blaseby
Partner, UK and European Patent Attorney, UPC Representative
Michael Nielsen
Partner, UK and European Patent Attorney, UPC Representative
Darren Smyth
Partner, UK and European Patent Attorney, Design Attorney, UPC Representative
Monika Rai
Partner, UK and European Patent Attorney, Solicitor, UPC Representative
Isabelle Schaller
Partner, Rechtsanwältin, UPC Representative
Sebastian Fuchs
Partner, Rechtsanwalt, UPC Representative
Gareth Probert
Partner, UK and European Patent Attorney, UPC Representative
Heather McCann
Partner, UK and European Patent Attorney, UPC Representative
James Seymour
Partner, UK and European Patent Attorney, UPC Representative
Catherine Howell
Partner, Solicitor

Contact us

We’d love to hear from you. Whether you're exploring ways to protect, manage or maximise the value of your intellectual property, we are here to provide tailored support and strategic insight.

Please complete the form below and we will be in touch shortly.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form. Please try again.