IP considerations arising from increased micro mobility competition

​
June 24, 2022

Following the Queen's Speech, and years of consultations and lobbying from the micro mobility sector, it looks like the e-scooter industry is in for a bumper year. The vehicles have until now been legal to buy, yet illegal to use on the UK's public roads except through authorised ride sharing schemes. However, this will now change through the creation of a new vehicle class for e-scooters specifically.

This is a positive development for the micro mobility sector overall, which in all likelihood will see an increased number of players vying for market share. Emerging start-ups will feel more confident to develop and launch innovative models and accessories, while already established sellers and the companies running ride sharing schemes will see it as an opportunity to quickly expand into what is already a substantial market.

An important aspect of this development, which must not be overlooked, is the role played by intellectual property (IP), and particularly patent and design protection, in how new and established companies shape the e-scooter market. Smaller players face an intense period of balancing the need to quickly grab market share, often using existing technologies, and the need to innovate. Elsewhere, more seasoned companies will want to protect themselves from edgy newcomers.

Pre-emptive entrants

The importance of carefully managing risks posed by third parties' existing patents cannot be underestimated for e-scooter start-ups. Innovators will be monitored by established companies looking to outcompete them and cannot afford any costly and time-consuming legal proceedings resulting from accusations of infringement. While some companies have these capabilities within their team, many will need support from the legal sector to ensure they are covered.

So, first and foremost, start-ups will be looking to confirm that they have Freedom to Operate (FTO). In other words, they will be checking that the products they want to launch in the UK will not infringe other companies' patents. Potentially infringing activities include making, selling, importing and storing infringing articles in the UK. All manner of aspects of scooters are subject to patent protection, such as folding mechanisms (see GB2589813) and accessory mounting devices (see GB2591202). Given patent rights are territorial, most will initially only have to focus on the UK, but companies looking to launch across many markets will face a more complex process of ensuring their FTO across territories.

Another factor to be considered is the future impact of invisible pending patent applications, resulting from the fact that patent applications are only published about 18 months after being submitted to the patent office. Given that the liberalisation of the market will have been foreseen by many, and that established players are already benefitting from the rapid growth in demand for e-scooters, there are likely to be many such applications submitted within the past year or so that are working their way through the patent examination system. Potential future costs of having to license a patent that is not yet enforceable at the time of a product launch need to be taken into account by new entrants. Having to modify products over time to avoid infringing patents is also more common than some might think. Key to success will be performing additional FTO checks periodically, primarily before, but also after, product launch.

Although less pressing that checking the FTO position, particularly if budgets are tight, innovative new entrants should at least consider patenting inventions in their products. Among the variety of benefits of having a patent portfolio is the "bargaining chip" they offer in case of a dispute with another patent holder. For example, if a patent infringement risk is identified by a new player, it might be possible to get the patent holder's permission to use their patented technology by granting them a cross-licence to something in the new player's own portfolio.

Many e-scooter companies will also look into registered design protection. This protects the appearance of a product, rather than its technical workings. For many companies whose differentiation will be largely tied to the design rather than the technical components of an e-scooter, registering designs might be the primary way to have enforceable protection against others, particularly copycats.

Defensive giants

While established e-scooter vendors will have more experience and access to extensive support than start-ups, we are all entering an era where assertive patenting will play an increasingly important role in defending market share. Existing market players need to ensure that any unique features of their products are protected against bullish newcomers. In other words, we can expect an intensification in the pursuit of patents, which needs to be monitored carefully.

In the short term, the fact that patents can only be enforced once they have been granted will mean that many companies with pending patent applications will do what they can to speed up their ongoing application processes, so that they can take action against infringers quickly if necessary. Another road many will go down, and which start-ups need to be alert to, is to monitor the new competition very closely and strategically broaden or split their pending applications to try and widen their reach before they are granted. Both approaches could hurt start-ups that have developed products or business models that are very similar to those of already established companies.

The pressure is on

This is an exciting time for anyone active in the micro mobility market, and it will be interesting to see what will come out of the e-scooter space following the Government's recent announcements. There are lots of causes for optimism for start-ups looking to make their mark, but the pressure is on for them to not only design and market their products innovatively but also to ensure they avoid potential legal pitfalls. In a few years' time, companies that rise to this challenge will be the ones reaping long-term success.

This article was first published in Startups Magazine.

The Latest Thought Leadership pieces in the Content Hub

No items found.
Stay in the Know

The Patent Strategist

Get expert insights and the top patent stories delivered straight to your inbox.

Heading
This is some text inside of a div block.
This is some text inside of a div block.

Latest Insights

Showing 0 of 100
The contentious role of intellectual property in cryptographic standardisation
12 January 2026
This article explores how intellectual property rights affect the development and adoption of post-quantum cryptography standards. It highlights NIST’s proactive approach to patent licensing for new algorithms, reviews historical cases like RSA and ECC, and discusses the importance of clear IP terms for widespread cryptographic adoption.
#
Patenting
​
System architecture in quantum computing – history repeating itself?
24 December 2025
This article explores the evolution of system architecture in quantum computing, drawing parallels with the early days of classical computing. It discusses the current challenges in quantum hardware, the emergence of quantum instruction set architectures (ISAs), and the potential for a RISC vs. CISC debate similar to that in classical computing. The piece highlights opportunities for innovation and intellectual property, suggesting that the choices made now could shape the future landscape of quantum technologies and licensing.
#
Patenting
​
Strategic licensing: Turning IP into commercial value
09 December 2025
In today’s competitive landscape, effective commercial licensing strategies are essential for unlocking the full value of intellectual property. This article explores four critical pillars: understanding intellectual property as a property right, the fundamentals of licensing intellectual property rights, structuring successful joint ventures and best practices for intellectual property rights management. Whether you’re navigating new markets or scaling established innovations, these tips provide a roadmap for protecting, leveraging and maximizing your IP assets.
#
Consulting
​
The people, physics and patents of the 2025 Nobel prize
09 December 2025
The 2025 Nobel Prize in Physics recognised John Clarke, Michel H. Devoret, and John M. Martinis for proving macroscopic quantum tunnelling in electric circuits, a breakthrough that enabled quantum computing. Their pioneering research led to hundreds of patents, including innovations in MRI and quantum technology, highlighting the real-world impact of their discoveries.
#
Patenting
​
Vision 2035: The need for Innovation to meet ambitious targets set by the UK’s new critical minerals strategy
03 December 2025
The UK’s Critical Minerals Strategy 2025 sets ambitious targets to secure essential minerals for key industries by boosting domestic production, recycling, and innovation. The article highlights the vital role of intellectual property (IP) in supporting technological advances, encouraging collaboration, and strengthening the UK’s supply chains for a sustainable future.
#
Consulting
​
Research underlying Nobel prize in chemistry has sparked innovation and patent filings
02 December 2025
The 2025 Nobel Prize in Chemistry recognised the creators of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), innovative materials with huge potential for water harvesting, clean energy, and environmental solutions. Their work has sparked a surge in global patent activity and new industrial application.
#
Patenting
​
UKIPO fee increases from April 2026: What it means for your IP strategy
25 November 2025
Provisional and interim injunctions both refer to temporary court orders granted before a full trial, aimed at preserving the status quo or preventing harm. In UK law, “interim injunction” is the standard term, while “provisional injunction” is less common and typically used in international contexts. Both serve the same purpose: urgent relief until the case is fully heard.
#
Patenting
​
Sustainable models: content licensing for generative AI training
21 November 2025
It is fair to say that no technology in recent times has created so much excitement and controversy as generative AI, and in particular Large Language Models (LLMs). Generative AI companies and their backers have their sights on generating billions, if not trillions of dollars, directly or indirectly from their models. Models which, in the vast majority of cases, are trained on original works without permission from, or payment to, their authors. The works used for training are primarily obtained by scraping the open web, a uniquely vast repository of publicly accessible knowledge and information, constantly updated to reflect the latest developments in human knowledge and culture.
#
Consulting
​
What should you look to protect in a (bio)pharma IP strategy?
18 November 2025
#
Patenting
​
Trade Secrets: Navigating geopolitical risks and IP theft in the semiconductor industry
04 November 2025
Semiconductors have always been a critical technology but have grown significantly in strategic importance in recent years. They have become the key building block in developing and existing markets, including quantum computing, edge computing, AI, IoT, automotive, cellular data technology, smartphones, robotics, and many more. The complex designs and innovations that power semiconductor manufacturing are invaluable both to the world’s economy and technological advancement. Consequently, the semiconductor industry has found itself at the centre of geopolitical tensions, especially between the United States and China. It has become a prime target for cyberattacks and intellectual-property (IP) theft. As such, companies operating in this area must be more vigilant in protecting their intellectual assets.
#
Consulting
​
UPC takes strict approach on costs reimbursement
30 October 2025
Insulet v. EOFlow UPC_CFI_773/2025 and UPC_CFI 774/2025 (Milan CD), decision of 15 October 2025[1] The dispute began when Insulet sought a provisional injunction against EOFlow to prevent...
#
Litigation
​
UPC Considers but does not decide exhaustion of rights in relation to consumables
30 October 2025
Brita v. Aquashield UPC CFI 248/2024 (Munich LD), decision of 22 August 2025[1] UPC CFI 564/2024 (Munich LD), decision of 16 October 2025[2] Brita sued Aquashield and others for infringement of...
#
Litigation
​
Beyond Borders: A Backpacker’s Take on Why Your Patent Strategy Needs a Global Mindset
29 September 2025
In today’s interconnected world, innovation rarely stops at borders. Whether you’re a multinational corporation or a UK-based business with global ambitions, your patent strategy should reflect the reality that your products, services, and competitors operate internationally. Much like a well-travelled backpacker planning a round-the-world adventure, businesses must prepare carefully—mapping out routes, anticipating local rules, and packing what’s essential—to ensure a smooth journey.
#
Patenting
​
UPC Infringement Actions: Is Speed Meeting Expectations?
23 September 2025
The Unified Patent Court promised simplified and faster patent litigation across Europe. Two years in, we look at whether it’s delivering on that promise. For patent holders and defendants alike, the duration of infringement actions can significantly impact market strategies, investment decisions, and competitive positioning. In this article, we set out an in-depth analysis of how the court’s procedural rules are shaping the pace of litigation. By examining key milestones—from the filing of an infringement action to the issuance of a final judgment—we assess whether the UPC is delivering on its promise of efficiency.
#
Litigation
​
Emerging Practice Points from the UPC
02 September 2025
We have been keeping a close eye on the decisions coming out of the UPC and as the court starts to establish itself a number of practice points are starting to emerge.
#
Litigation
​